http://www.ehealthhq.com Fioricet, Tramadol, Butalbital apap caffeine, carisoprodol Pain Medicine Resources, Nutrition, Herbs, Food, and Online Drugs Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:23:52 +0000 en hourly 1 http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/paxil-directly-linked-to-birth-defects/ http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/paxil-directly-linked-to-birth-defects/#comments Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:54:53 +0000 admin http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/paxil-directly-linked-to-birth-defects/ Nick Johnson asked:


Recent studies have shown that the use of Paxil during pregnancy increases the chances of birth defects. In December 2005, the Food and Drug Administration moved Paxil from a class C drug to a class D drug. A class C drug is one that has been proven to harm animals; and a class D drug is one that has been proven to harm the human fetus. According to the FDA, a Swedish study was done which proved that women who took Paxil in the first trimester (first twelve weeks) of the pregnancy had two times higher risk in having a baby with some form of birth defect than other women who took another form of antidepressant or non antidepressant medication.

Some of the harms or birth defects caused by the use of Paxil before or during pregnancy include potential infant heart defects and persistent pulmonary hypertension in newborn babies. During the first trimester of a pregnancy, the babies heart develops. According to medical experts, the most crucial time is during weeks three through seven because this is when the heart is taking the form of four separate chambers.

In addition to infant heart defects, there are several other potential defects that can result from taking Paxil during a pregnancy. For example, a 2005 research study showed the women who took Paxil during a pregnancy, especially during the first trimester, were more like to have an omphalocele; a birth defect which is a malformation where the abdominal contents protrude into the base of the umbilical cord. A condition known as craniosynostosis; another birth defect which is an early closing of one or more of the sutures of an infant’s head, causing a malformation of the skull is another potential defect that can result from the use of Paxil during a pregnancy.

Lung disorders are yet another birth defect that can be directly linked to the use of Paxil during a pregnancy. In 2006, the FDA issued an advisory notice saying that infants had problems with adjusting to breathing air when they first came out of the womb, which required them to have some sort of mechanical ventilation to assist with breathing. They claim that this birth defect can also be linked back to the use of Paxil during the pregnancy.

In conclusion, the FDA has said and proven that there are several birth defects that can be related to taking Paxil medication during the pregnancy. These include birth defects affecting the heart, lungs, and overall development. Women have a higher risk of birth defects, if the Paxil is taken before or during the pregnancy. Many lawsuits are now being initiated because of birth defects which could possibly be the result of taking Paxil medication during the pregnancy. If you have been taking or are currently taking Paxil and you are pregnant, then you should discontinue its use, contact your doctor and seek legal advice right away.



The cheapest carisoprodol online ]]> http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/paxil-directly-linked-to-birth-defects/feed/ 0 http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/don%e2%80%99t-let-bad-genetics-keep-you-from-building-big-muscular-biceps/ http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/don%e2%80%99t-let-bad-genetics-keep-you-from-building-big-muscular-biceps/#comments Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:48:37 +0000 admin http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/don%e2%80%99t-let-bad-genetics-keep-you-from-building-big-muscular-biceps/ Mark G. Winston asked:


No matter who you are, I believe that you can build thickly muscled and chiseled biceps regardless of your size or body weight. Having said this, the fact remains that not all of us have the genetic potential to become Mr. Olympia (and most of us probably don’t want that much development anyway). The exact role of genetics in bodybuilding is not fully understood. One thing is certain – you’ve got to train smart to maximize whatever genetic potential you have to build massive, well-defined biceps.

Some people use “bad genetics” as a convenient excuse for quitting their training programs when they fail to see quick results. Don’t fall into this trap. You must remember to set your own goals and work to achieve them without comparing yourself to anyone else. Besides, how can you know what your genetic potential actually is until you’ve spent every effort and tried every available workout to maximize it?

Regardless of your genetic makeup, most of your biceps building success will depend upon the consistency and technical aspects of your training and proper nutrition. Moreover, you should understand that not every workout is going to deliver your desired results because there is no single exercise or workout plan that works for everyone. Depending on your body type and genetic abilities, some workouts will give you great results, some will work only modestly and others won’t work for you at all.

Biceps Training To Fit Your Body Type

To maximize your genetic potential to build big, muscular biceps you’ve got to understand your body type. In purest terms, the human body comes in three physiological forms: ectomorphic, endomorphic and mesomorphic. An ectomorph is the typical “hard gainer” who has general difficulty in gaining weight, especially muscle mass. Ectomorphs are usually tall with long, lean limbs, narrow shoulders and a relatively fragile bone structure. Ectomorphs also tend to have a high metabolism that causes the calorie burn that can eat into protein stores needed to build muscle after a workout.

Endomorphs are at the opposite end of the body type spectrum. Endomorphs tend to have rounded or “stocky” bodies with a slower metabolism that makes it easy for them to gain muscle. Unfortunately, this slow metabolism also means that endomorphs can get fat very easily. Endomorphs are particularly well-suited for powerlifting movements, but their tendency to hold on to calories makes high-repetition and cardiovascular training critical to their ability to achieve superior muscular shape and definition.

In between the ectomporhic and endomorphic body types is the mesomorph. Mesomorphs tend to have a naturally strong, balanced and athletic physique with an ability to gain and display muscle much more easily than the other body types (think NFL linebackers or world class sprinters). Although mesomorphs have a higher metabolism than endomorphs, they don’t have the ectomporhic ability to naturally burn calories and must therefore carefully monitor their food intake to avoid getting fat.

While pure ectomorphs, endomorphs and mesomorphs theoretically exist, the reality is that most people have mixed body types (e.g., “mesomorph-endomorph”). When it comes to training in a way that best fits your body type, there are subtle but important differences depending on whether you’re primarily an ectomorph, endomorph or mesomorph. If you’re mostly ectomorphic, you should emphasize low repetition mass building techniques with extended training intervals that minimize cardiovascular exercise.

On the other hand, if you’re primarily endormorphic you should emphasize high repetition training cycles with extended intervals that regularly include high intensity cardiovascular workouts. Finally, if you’re mostly mesomorphic your biceps should respond well to both low and high repetition training with moderate amounts of high intensity cardiovascular training for enhanced muscularity. The bottom line is that you must work with whatever genetic potential you have to build the big, muscular biceps that you desire. And you’ll never reach that potential if you quit too soon because of “bad genetics.”



Buy Tramadol, Fioricet, ultracet at the cheapest prices ]]> http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/don%e2%80%99t-let-bad-genetics-keep-you-from-building-big-muscular-biceps/feed/ 0 http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/an-overview-of-the-presidential-candidates%e2%80%99-stances-on-human-genetics-issues/ http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/an-overview-of-the-presidential-candidates%e2%80%99-stances-on-human-genetics-issues/#comments Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:44:05 +0000 admin http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/an-overview-of-the-presidential-candidates%e2%80%99-stances-on-human-genetics-issues/ Katherine Groff asked:


Wrangling over economic and national security issues has left health and genetic discussions on the backburner in the presidential race. However, the three leading candidates have been active on these issues during and prior to their time in the Senate. Barack Obama has encouraged personalized medicine research and genetic test regulation; John McCain has concentrated on stem cell research; and Hillary Clinton has been active in all of these areas as well as newborn screening and genetic and environment interactions.

Genomic Research and Personalized Medicine

Clinton’s and Obama’s past initiatives demonstrate their strong support for and encouragement of the growth and application of genetics-based medicine. From 1998 to 2000, as First Lady, Clinton held nine events called Millennium Evenings at the White House. Each focused on a different subject, and included a session titled “Informatics Meets Genomics” that stressed the development and importance of genetic research.

Obama has sponsored a genetics-related bill twice in his approximately three years in the Senate; both times the legislation stalled in Senate committees. He stated that the goal of the Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act was “to secure the promise of personalized medicine for all Americans by expanding and accelerating genomics research and initiatives to improve the accuracy of disease diagnosis, increase the safety of drugs, and identify novel treatments.”

The bill would have required formal studies of genetic technology in order to advance the field. It also sought to move this field forward through a national biobanking research initiative, and the 2006 version included support for local biobanking initiatives. Additionally, it encouraged the movement of genetic technology from the research laboratory to the clinic through increased training of healthcare professionals and the creation of genetic screening tools, diagnostics, and treatments from genomic information gathered from research initiatives.

Obama attended the 2006 Genetics and Public Policy Center’s National Genetic Policy Summit. At this event, he highlighted “the unparalleled promise genomics holds” of tailoring treatments to people’s individual genetics. However, he pointed out that few genetics-based tests had reached the market. This is what prompted him to introduce the Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act of 2006, he told the audience. Through the bill, he said he hoped to spur increased support for genomics, modernization of the Food and Drug Administration’s process of evaluating genetics tests, and the creation of a database of information from the proposed national biobank.

Genetic Privacy

Clinton cosponsored the Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance and Employment Act (2001) and the Equal Rights and Equal Dignity for Americans Act of 2003, which sought to outlaw genetic discrimination by employers and health insurance companies. Neither bill reached the Senate floor for a vote, but a similar comprehensive anti- genetic discrimination bill, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Acts (GINA) of 2003 and 2005, has passed twice in the Senate. In both years, the bill passed unanimously but then stalled in the House.

In 2003 Clinton and McCain voted in favor of the bill – Obama was not yet elected to office. In her statement on this bill, Clinton said, “Americans have already shown that they will not fully participate in genetic research or take advantage of genetic technologies until they believe that they are protected against genetic discrimination in health insurance and employment.” She added, “Discrimination based on genetic information would be a step backward for civil rights and human dignity.” In 2005 Clinton was one of 25 cosponsors of the bill, and both McCain and Obama voted in favor of it. In 2007 Clinton and Obama cosponsored the current version of GINA with 36 other Senators, but the Senate has not yet voted on it.

Clinton also has addressed genetic discrimination in other ways than GINA. In her introduction to the “Informatics Meets Genomics” Millennium Evening, Clinton asked, “How will we make sure that knowledge about our genes is used to heal us, not deny us health insurance or jobs?” Additionally, in 2001 Senate floor statements, she emphasized the need for Congress to address genetic discrimination.

Regulation of Genetic Tests

Obama called for increased genetic test regulation at the Center’s National Genetic Policy Summit and in the Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act. Among its provisions, the Genomics bill includes “[improving] access to and appropriate utilization of valid, reliable and accurate molecular genetic tests.” Obama stressed that that this would require “greater attention to the quality of genetic tests, direct-to-consumer advertising, and use of personal genomic information.” He said he wanted the bill to increase the “safety, efficacy, and availability of information about genetic tests.” The bill would initiate a study regarding Federal oversight of genetic tests, create a framework for genetic test review, promote transparency by requiring information from federally funded biobanking initiatives to be publicly available, and evaluate direct-to-consumer marketing.

Stem Cell Research and Cloning

Clinton, Obama, and McCain have supported federal funding of embryonic stem cell research. All three candidates voted in favor of the Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2007, which would have authorized human embryonic stem cell research with the condition that the stem cells were from excess embryos donated from in vitro fertilization clinics. In Senate floor statements, McCain remarked that the bill “promote[d] the benefits of stem cell research while maintaining clearly our ethical and moral values and obligations” and that “[s]tem cell research has the potential to give us a better understanding of deadly diseases and spinal cord injuries affecting millions of Americans.” This bill passed the Senate and the House, but was vetoed by the President.

All three candidates have opposed human cloning. The Human Cloning Ban Act of 2005 was cosponsored by Clinton and Obama, and the Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2007 was cosponsored by McCain. Both bills are still in Senate committees. Clinton again demonstrated her opposition to cloning by cosponsoring the Human Cloning Ban and Stem Cell Research Protection Act of 2005, which also never left the Senate committee to which it was referred. The bill was designed to build an ethical framework for stem cell research by banning human cloning, prohibiting research on embryos after they are 14 days old (excluding any time they are stored at subzero temperatures), requiring informed consent of egg donors, mandating that eggs be donated and not sold or purchased, and requiring egg collection sites to be separate from research laboratories.

McCain cosponsored the Human-Animal Hybrid Prohibition Act of 2007, which is still in committee. Due to a shortage of donated embryos from IVF treatments, some researchers want to remove the nuclei of animal eggs and replace them with human DNA. After the embryos develop for up to two weeks, the stem cells would be removed and the embryos destroyed. Scientists would then grow the stem cells, study their development and the causes of diseases, and test treatments on the cells. The act would prohibit this practice, as well as the creation of human-animal embryos for any other purpose, on ethical grounds.

Newborn Screening

Clinton has cosponsored two bills related to newborn screening, including introducing the Screening for Health of Infants and Newborns Act (SHINE) in 2006 and 2007. In her introductory remarks, she highlighted that “[e]arly detection by newborn screening can lessen side effects or completely prevent progression of many … disorders if medical intervention is started early enough” and that “[e]very child should have access to tests that may prevent them from a life-threatening disease.” The bill aimed to help states strengthen their screening programs; to establish procedures for newborn screening tests, reporting, and data standards for states; and to create a database of “current educational and family support and services information, materials, resources, research, and data on newborn screening.”

The SHINE Act failed to progress past a Senate committee, but its provision to create a database was incorporated into The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007, which Clinton cosponsored. This bill also would create a screening program at the National Institutes of Health, and it passed the Senate by unanimous consent and is awaiting committee consideration in the House.

Genetics and Environmental Health

Clinton introduced the Coordinated Environmental Health Network Act in 2004 and 2005 and in 2007 as the Coordinated Environmental Public Health Network Act. This bill sought to build a network to track diseases and identify and address risks, particularly environmental risks, as well as “encourage coordination between researchers and Federal, State, and local entities, including the National Institutes of Health, for genetic studies on diseases associated with environmental factors with an emphasis on finding genetic risk factors and mutations associated with such diseases.” In her introductory remarks for the bill in 2007, Clinton emphasized the importance of researching how genetic factors interact with the environment to cause disease, and she highlighted “initiatives like the Human Genome Project” that have made “incredible strides in our understanding of the science of genetics, so that we can better prevent and treat diseases.” The bill currently sits with the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

McCain’s, Obama’s, and Clinton’s initiatives have promoted the growth and potential of genetics as well as encouraged increased federal regulation in several areas of the field. All three candidates would bring to the office of the President the potential for much-needed movement on genetics-related issues.



Buy Tramadol, Fioricet, ultracet at the cheapest prices ]]> http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/an-overview-of-the-presidential-candidates%e2%80%99-stances-on-human-genetics-issues/feed/ 0 http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/paxil-birth-defects-facts/ http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/paxil-birth-defects-facts/#comments Sat, 19 Sep 2009 05:31:02 +0000 admin http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/paxil-birth-defects-facts/ Nick Johnson asked:


Paxil is a common antidepressant that was heavily pushed through the media to the general public to help alleviate symptoms of depression in men and women. Depression is a difficult and taxing clinical disorder to overcome, and Paxil shone through the darkness as a beacon of hope to countless individuals undergoing treatment for depression.

Doctors and the media are now urging women who are or may become pregnant to switch to a different medication as a result of an onslaught of Paxil birth defects. Paxil has been shown to increase the risk of birth defects by at least 50%. Paxil birth defects tend to affect a baby’s heart more than any other organ. The risk of Paxil birth defects was not commonly advertised or even well known at the time Paxil was introduced to the market.

Paxil was introduced to the market under a Category C pregnancy risk, which simply means that Paxil was not known to cause birth defects. It has since been upgraded to a Category D, which states there is a high risk of Paxil birth defects, although the effects of passing the medication through the mother’s breast milk are known, the benefits carry a higher percentage factor than the risk factor. Any doctor prescribing Paxil to a nursing mother should outline the risks very clearly.

Paxil birth defects created an outrage and naturally the pharmaceutical company was held accountable, although the Paxil birth defects that are still being tallied have the option to file a lawsuit against the Paxil pharmacy company. Any qualified Paxil attorney can assist a woman or parents in understanding their legal rights.

There is of course the risk of developing a Paxil addiction, which has only complicated matters in getting pregnant women off Paxil for the health of their fetus. Most notably at risk in the first trimester, Paxil addiction can grab hold of a pregnant woman prior to her knowledge of pregnancy. This two fold medical situation has destroyed countless families as they have struggled to put the pieces back together again. Keeping in mind that Paxil is an antidepressant, those taking Paxil were struggling to begin with, and now they have a Paxil addiction and run the risk of giving birth to a baby with Paxil birth defects.

There are naturally legal remedies for a family devastated by the use of Paxil. A Paxil attorney can advise of the full legal rights, but most people will find they have a window of time to sue the pharmaceutical company and in some cases the prescribing physician, for compensation. Financial compensation does not remove the struggle of a Paxil addiction or ease the intense pain of having a child with a Paxil birth defect, but it does allow for the resources necessary to provide medical care both for the mother and the baby.

Any Paxil attorney will tell you, the only thing these families desire is a happy healthy mother and a strong and healthy infant. Paxil addictions and Paxil birth defects are very serious consequences for those who simply went searching for help.



cialis ]]> http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/paxil-birth-defects-facts/feed/ 0 http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/structural-defects-or-birth-defects-information/ http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/structural-defects-or-birth-defects-information/#comments Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:46:17 +0000 admin http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/structural-defects-or-birth-defects-information/ Juliet Cohen asked:


A birth defect is a problem that happens while a baby is developing in the mother’s body. Birth defects are defined as abnormalities of structure, work or body metabolism that are present at birth. These abnormalities lead to mental or physical disabilities or are fatal. Birth defects affect about one in every 33 babies born in the United States each year. About 150,000 babies are born with birth defects each year in the United States.They are the leading cause of infant deaths, accounting for more than 20% of all infant deaths. Babies born with birth defects have a greater chance of illness and long term disability than babies without birth defects. Birth defects can be caused by genetic, environmental, or unknown factors. Other causes of birth defects include alcohol abuse by the mother and Rh disease

Which can occur when the mother’s and baby’s Rh factors are different. Although a few medications can cause problems, of the 200 most commonly prescribed drugs, none is associated with a significant risk of birth defects. Environmental causes of birth defects have more to do with the mother’s health and exposure to chemicals or diseases. When a mother has certain infections, such as rubella, during pregnancy, it can cause birth defects. Multifactorial birth defects are caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors and include neural tube defects and cleft lip and palate. Genetics play a role in some birth defects. Every cell in the body has chromosomes containing genes that determine a person’s unique characteristics.

Treatment of congenital anomalies is specific for each individual. Individuals with severe or numerous abnormalities usually require multidisciplinary treatment. Babies with birth defects may need surgery or other medical treatments. Prenatal surgery has saved babies with urinary tract blockages and rare tumors of the lung. Other prevention is not smoking, and avoiding secondhand smoke , Avoiding alcohol ,Eating a healthy diet and taking prenatal vitamins (make sure you’re getting enough folic acid) , Avoiding all illicit drugs , getting exercise and plenty of rest and getting early and regular prenatal care. Couples who have had a baby with a birth defect, or who have a family history of birth defects, should consider consulting a genetic counselor. Rroutine obstetrical care also helpful.

Not smoking, and avoiding secondhand smoke.

1. Avoiding alcohol.

2. Avoiding all illicit drugs.

3. Eating a healthy diet and taking prenatal vitamins.

4. Getting exercise and plenty of rest.

5. Getting early and regular prenatal care.



Fioricet blog, know more about fioricet ]]> http://www.ehealthhq.com/2009/09/structural-defects-or-birth-defects-information/feed/ 0